The Behaviorally-Anchored Review Scale (BARS) |
||
Lesson
Plan |
||
Objectives |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to acceptable,]
Objectives were behaviorally-based, clearly stated and posted. If necessary,
they were adjusted to meet the stated needs of the audience. |
Objectives were clearly
defined and were aligned with the advertised description. The presenter
reviewed them at the beginning of the class. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [----------- 2--------- ] Much
of my understanding of objectives grew as I learned in the class. This is
more a comment about me than the class. 3 8 9 10
DonÕt recall review of objective @ every class 11 [------------------ 13----------------- ] 14 I had no idea what they were.
Would have been good to do a mid-course review. 15 |
||
Warm-up |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] Warm up exercises were linked to the topic and got people thinking
about it. It was clear that the exercise was designed for this particular
class. |
Warm up exercise broke the
ice and made attendees comfortable with each other, the presenter and the
topic. A sense of mutual safety was created. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [-------- 2------ ] The
check-in, changing to meet needs as the weeks went on- was very good. 3 8 9 10 Warm up exercises was basically check in-
donÕt recall others. No mark for 11. Comment was: Not sure about this. The
initial check-ins usually served the purpose of putting us in a ÒcomfortableÓ
space. [------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 was built
through the check-ins and check-outs. 15 |
||
Needs Assessment |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to acceptable,]
the assessment was clearly used to modify the content and/or presentation of
the class. Presenter kept track of results to ensure that attendee needs were
addressed. |
Presenter solicited the
comments and needs of the attendees in order to assess their knowledge base.
Questions outside the scope of the class were handled in a respectful manner. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------ 2----- ] Needs
arose during and after classes. Needs were considered, discussed and collectively
worked with the whole group where appropriate. 3 8 9 10 Very
close attention to what was going on in class and modified as needed. No mark for 11. Comment was Ònot sure.Ó [----------- 13------------- ] scope; appropriate classroom discussion 14 presenter
was incredibly responsive to student needs 15 |
||
Presentation |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presentation was useful for a variety of learning styles and
intelligences. Attendees were engaged and challenged in a safe and supportive
environment. |
The
presentation was focused on the subject. The information was relevant to the
attendeesÕ needs and previous knowledge. Digressions from the topic were
respectfully steered back to the subject. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [--------- 2------- ] 3 8 9 10
Would have liked more presentations. 11 [------------- 13----------- ] more
step by step presentation of Nathanson content 14 15 |
||
Practice |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] exercises were clearly designed for a variety of learning styles
and intelligences. |
There
were exercises that reinforced the presentation. Exercises were challenging,
but not threatening. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------ 2----- ] 3 8 9 10 Not very many interactive
exercises. 11 no mark for 13 14 15 |
||
Interactivity |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] class was clearly designed to be interactive between attendees
and btw. attendees & presenter. Attendees were solicited for ideas,
development of the agenda and feedback during the class. |
Throughout
the class, interactions between presenter & attendees were handled
respectfully. During practice, presenter assessed the learning. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [-------- 2------ ] Could have
used 2 classes on Non-defensive communication- even a whole course!! 3 8 9 10 11 [-------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 15 |
||
Recap |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presenter used different language to reinforce the material.
The recap was rooted in the class objectives. |
Presenter
reviewed the lesson material in order to reinforce it. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------- 2------ ] 3 8 10 Mostly done;
not always recapped as I recall. DonÕt recall this specifically (arrow pointing
to Òused different languageÓ) 11 [-------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 15 |
||
Time Management |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presenter kept the group focused on the topic. Sidetracked
conversations were respectfully redirected to the topic. |
The
presenter managed their time in order to allow adequate coverage of lesson. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------- 2------- ] 3 8 9 10 11 The material was so engaging that the class
rarely, if ever, deviated from the topic of discussion. We could have done
better with starting and ending on time. [------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 15 |
||
Speaking Skills |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presenter used a variety of speaking styles, modifying pitch,
tone, body language and volume in order to keep attention and appeal to a
variety of learning styles. |
The
presenterÕs speaking style was engaging, kept peoplesÕ attention and clear.
Body language was relaxed and confident. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [---- 2---- ] 3 8 9 10 11 [------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 considering
the subject, an outstanding job. The presenter may wish to consider acting
lessons to add a little more variety to tone and pitch. 15 |
||
Sexuality
Information |
||
Language |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the language used invited disclosure by modeling receptivity to
all sexualities and issues. If necessary, the presenter confronted someone
regarding their language. PresenterÕs language reflected the attendeesÕ. |
The
presenter modeled non-biased language at all times. If attendees used biased
language, the presenter reframed their comments/questions before responding. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [----- 2----- ] 3 8 9 10 Excellently done. Diversity affirmed @ all levels. No mark for 11. Comment was ÒNot sure IÕm
comfortable with the embedded assumption that language policing is Ògood.Ó
Perhaps rather than ÒconfrontingÓ peopleÕs word choices, a more productive response
would be to engage them in conversation about what they intend to
communicate.Ó [---------------- 13---------------- ] 14 15 |
||
Accuracy |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presenter suggested alternative sources for issues outside their
scope of knowledge and solicited information from other attendees. |
The
information presented was generally considered accurate by sex educators.
Opinions and theories were clearly labeled as such. The presenter made the
limits of their information clear |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------ 2----- ] 3 8 9 10 11 [---------------- 13-------------- ] 14 15 |
||
Sex-Positivity |
||
|
|
|
[In addition to
acceptable,] the presenter challenged attendeesÕ attitudes towards other peoplesÕ
sexualities. If necessary, the presenter addressed erotophobia by affirming
peopleÕs beliefs while redirecting misinformation. |
The
presenter modeled supportive attitudes towards diverse sexualities. |
Needs work on: |
Comments: 1 [------- 2------- ] 3 8 9 Charlie did an outstanding job in presenting
complex material in an understandable way by engaging the class and creating
a safe culture. This is one of the best instructors I have ever had- and IÕm
a doctoral student. 10 Charlie,
I donÕt recall very much, if any, erotophobia in the class, but I felt very
safe that if there were, you would have dealt with it effectively. 11 [------------------- 13----------------- ] 14 Overall,
what a truly wonderful job you did. I hope that the 2 suggestions IÕve made in
no way detract from your understanding of the respect and gratitude I have
for you. 15 |